This is the mail archive of the egcs@egcs.cygnus.com mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS home page for more information.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]

Re: egcs 1.1.1, and glibc2.1



On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Keith Duthie wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:
>
>> I have done this about a month ago (upgraded Slackware-3.6 to glibc-2.1)
>> and I'm now writting this message on this system. 
>Slackware 3.6 here, too.
>
>> You should read instructions from glibc-2.1 source archive. However be
>> prepared to met more incompatibilities as mentioened there: I rebuild
>> egcs, ncurses, X11 (I met incompatibilities when tried to use X11 static
>> libraries from glibc2 binary archives), Qt, KDE-1.1 and many many other things.
>I'm probably going to stick with the libc5 X11 binaries from the slackware
>packages. And ncurses was rather obvious - after all, you can't test the
>system with a kernel rebuild until you do. I'm probably not going to
>bother rebuilding most stuff - mainly static libraries.
>
>And, of course, I did read instructions. Nowhere did it state that at the
>end of 'make install' it would crash with a message telling me to check a
>bunch of stuff unrelated to the problem.
>
>> Now I have working system (however I haven't rebuilt all)
>I've just rebuild it under itself with the glibc2.1 egcs I built. I've got
>it on a chrooted partition, so I can test it without killing my system or
>having to reboot :-)
>
>But the question is: was it an egcs or a glibc2.1 bug?

Perhaps none of them. 

Question which prefix did You use for glibc-2.1. I used 
/usr to replace existing installation.