This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: multiple definitions of 'xxx keyed to...' in egcs-1.1.1


> 
> 
>   In message <m10DUeS-00038sC@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
>   > You got it backward. Making ctors/dtors local on ELF FIXES the bug on
>   > ELF. However, your patch won't hurt.
> Yours works by introducing an ELF specific hack.
> 
> Jason's patch, while not 100% correct either is a lot closer than yours since

Mine is 100% correct on ELF.

> it works for a large number of targets instead of just ELF.  The cases where
> it fails should be minimial as far as I can tell.
> 
> HJ, remember, we care about more than just Linux and ELF.  We have to.
> 

That is fine. But why cannot we have both? That way, ELF will be 100%
correct and others will be almost correct? For me, this discussion
makes few difference. I will make ELF 100% safe for Linux in anycase.

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]