This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: eb77.C
- To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: eb77.C
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at hurl dot cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:45:56 -0700
- cc: robertlipe at usa dot net (Robert Lipe), egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199902151911.TAA26088@phal.cygnus.co.uk>you write:
> > Many of the g++.robertl tests were things (even wrong things) that
> > caused ICE's at one point. So fixing the code to be defined would
> > avoid the ICE. Unfortunately, this type of data was lost when I
> > boiled everything down to testsuite cases.
> >
> > This doesn't seem to be one of those cases. I suggest either fixing the
> > testcase or removing it. It's entirely your decision.
>
> Well, if the original problem was an ICE (for invalid code), then the
> test should only be compiled, but not executed.
>
> I don't know how to do this with the g++.old-deja tests.
I think you just need a comment like this at the start of the file:
// Build don't link: