This is the mail archive of the egcs@egcs.cygnus.com mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS home page for more information.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]

Constructors and destructors of static variables

I have the following problem:

Suppose we have the three files:


main.cc:
-------------------------------
#include "X.hh"

int main ()
{
  X x;
}
-------------------------------


X.hh
-------------------------------
class X
{
public:
  X ();
  ~X ();
};

class Y
{
public:
  Y ();
  ~Y ();
};
--------------------------------


X.cc:
-------------------------------
#include <iostream.h>
#include "X.hh"

static Y y;

X::X()
{
  cout << "constructor X" << endl;
}

X::~X()
{
  cout << "destructor X" << endl;
}

Y::Y()
{
  cout << "constructor Y" << endl;
}

Y::~Y()
{
  cout << "destructor Y" << endl;
}
--------------------------------

Now compilation, static linkage and execution yield:

33: g++ -c X.cc
34: g++ -o main main.cc X.o
35: main
constructor Y
constructor X
destructor X
destructor Y

While compilation, shared linkage and execution yield:

45: g++ -c X.cc
46: ld -shared -o X.so X.o
47: g++ -o main main.cc X.so
48: main
constructor X
destructor X

Is that what we want, or is this a bug? What about y,

is there some memory reserved for y? What are the consequences?

Environment:

Redhat 5.2

49: g++ -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.90.29/specs
gcc version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)
50: ld -v
GNU ld version 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.15)

Thank you for comments and suggestions

Adrian

--
Adrian Trapletti, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Administration, Augasse 2-6, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Phone: ++43 1 31336 4561, Fax: ++43 1 31336 708,
Email: adrian.trapletti@wu-wien.ac.at