This is the mail archive of the
egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: Packaging wrong? (was Re: egcs-ss-19990208 is now available)
- To: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Subject: Re: Packaging wrong? (was Re: egcs-ss-19990208 is now available)
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law@hurl.cygnus.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:49:05 -0700
- cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: listarch-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 12 Feb 1999 20:49:58 MST. <19990212204958.A11205@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Mailing-List: contact egcs-help@egcs.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
- Reply-To: law@cygnus.com
- Sender: owner-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
In message <19990212204958.A11205@physik.fu-berlin.de>you write:
> I just tried core+g++ on an alpha-dec-osf4.0b and i386-unknown-freebsd2.2.8
>
> It looks like the packaging is not decorrelated. Without great knowledge of
> what is going on here, I'd say that perhaps the new localization code from
> gcc2 was not written with drop in distributions in mind (?).
What "make" are you using?
jeff