This is the mail archive of the
egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Fix for short-enums comparison bug
- To: Tim Hollebeek <tim@wagner.Princeton.EDU>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for short-enums comparison bug
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law@hurl.cygnus.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 15:17:45 -0700
- cc: jbuck@Synopsys.COM, gavin@cygnus.com, cgw@alum.mit.edu, egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: listarch-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:16:04 MST. <199902112216.RAA27319@wagner.Princeton.EDU>
- Mailing-List: contact egcs-help@egcs.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
- Reply-To: law@cygnus.com
- Sender: owner-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
In message <199902112216.RAA27319@wagner.Princeton.EDU>you write:
> I seriously doubt it, since arguments to integer operators undergo
> integral promotion. The rules are different for C++, but I believe
> the answer is no, since none of the standard integral types is allowed
> to have only 2 bits.
I'm not looking for "I doubt/I believe". I need folks to actually check the
relavent standard and say "The standard ..." :-)
jeff