This is the mail archive of the
egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
mailing list for the EGCS project. See the EGCS
home page for more information.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Re: `quad' printf format specifier ?
- To: Marc Espie <Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr>
- Subject: Re: `quad' printf format specifier ?
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@LS5.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
- Date: 08 Feb 1999 10:44:24 +0100
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@blastula.phys.columbia.edu>, egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: listarch-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- Delivered-To: mailing list egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
- In-Reply-To: Marc Espie's message of "Sat, 6 Feb 1999 22:23:05 +0100"
- Mailing-List: contact egcs-help@egcs.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
- References: <19990206133120.26761@liafa1.liafa.jussieu.fr> <199902061904.OAA02631@blastula.phys.columbia.edu> <19990206222305.19585@liafa1.liafa.jussieu.fr>
- Sender: owner-egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
Marc Espie <Marc.Espie@liafa.jussieu.fr> writes:
|> I would very much like to know what's the exact status of stuff such as
|> atoq(), or printf("%qd"). Does it correspond to any current standard/draft,
|> or is it just a common extension that is supposed to work in a given way ?
The C9X standard has atoll and printf("%lld"), and generally uses the ll
suffix for long long variants of funtions. The `q' variants are just BSD
extensions.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
schwab@issan.cs.uni-dortmund.de completely different"
schwab@gnu.org