This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New gcc port (ATMEL AVR) and question
- To: Michael Meissner <meissner at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: New gcc port (ATMEL AVR) and question
- From: Bill Currie <bill at taniwha dot tssc dot co dot nz>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 11:32:15 +1300
- CC: Denis Chertykov <denis at medo dot fov dot uni-mb dot si>, egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- References: <402.914815665@upchuck> <zp84fgag.fsf@dialup238.intercom.ru> <19990104152151.A6950@tiktok.cygnus.com>
Michael Meissner wrote:
>
> In the past, it was not a good idea to have more than one pattern for moves,
> due to misfeatures in reload (basically it would not reset the insn id # when
> reload changed the move instruction, leaving later phases to call abort).
> Whether or not it is safe now, I dunno, but I would err on the side of caution.
I noticed problems that were probably related to this with my efforts
for the i860 (had to stop in November). It might not be a bed idea to
get reload to reset the insn id if it doesn't yet.
Bill
--
Leave others their otherness.