This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: expand and truncate and 387


In a message dated 11/19/98 3:10:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, law@cygnus.com
writes:

>   > Assuming the usual long-double precision control setting,
>    > converting from lower to higher precision is a no-op.
>  Is that something we can safely assume?  I don't think so.
>  
Don't the other control settings simply limit the maximum precision available?
The single precision setting is not recommended, presumably since it
eliminates double, so there is no point in making conversions work under it.
This leaves conversion from single (float) to double, and doesn't that work
the same regardless of whether the control setting is double or long double?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]