This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Checkin Policy
- To: amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk
- Subject: Re: Checkin Policy
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at markmitchell dot com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 13:13:05 -0800
- CC: amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk, egcs at cygnus dot com
- References: <199811181917.TAA06857@phal.cygnus.co.uk>
- Reply-to: mark at markmitchell dot com
>>>>> "Joern" == Joern Rennecke <amylaar@cygnus.co.uk> writes:
>> So, I suggest that you take the time to run the C++ testsuite
>> as well. If you notice the C++ test results changing over
>> time, please complain; that will encourage the C++ developers
>> (myself included) to make sure we're not breaking the
>> testsuite.
Joern> That's what I'm seeing right now. It seems that some
Joern> things just don't work with libc5 ???
That's probably right. It looks like you're seeing a lot of EH
problems. Even some of the ones that don't have `eh' or `dyncast' in
their name appear to be EH-related.
HJ is probably the expert on what binutils/libc versions are required
to make things work. Unfortunately, I don't have a libc5 machine
anymore (I do actually have libc5 on my system, but no headers for
it.) I'm sorry I can't offer more help.
Probably, we should try to get the libc5 tests working as well, unless
there is some fundamental limitation in libc5 that keeps these things
from working. I suspect that libc5 will be with us for quite a while,
so we probably shouldn't ignore it.
Thank you for trying this experiment. I suggest you use the results
you obtained as a baseline; that will at least tell you if things are
changing. Please let us know if things do change for the worse.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@markmitchell.com
Mark Mitchell Consulting http://www.markmitchell.com