This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
- To: manfred at s-direktnet dot de, Manfred dot Hollstein at ks dot sel dot alcatel dot de
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
- From: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 13:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
> But, I agree with H.J., it would be fine if more people were testing
> libg++ from time to time. For instance, the current mainline sources
> look pretty much OK without libg++, but with libg++ "make check" fails
> for hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20, m68k-motorola-sysv and m88k-motorola-sysv3.
> Perhaps it would also be helpful if we'd extend the test_summary script
> to report if "configure"d directories have been found in the tree, but
> the particular *.log files are missing. Currently if libg++ fails, no
> results are posted for libg++ and nobody knows there's a problem :-(
>
FWIW, the current egcs in CVS still miscompiles libg++ on
Linux/x86. I may not have time to look into it before the
end of October.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)