This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.92.11 19980921 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental)
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 03:41:35 -0600
- cc: burley at gnu dot org (Craig Burley), drees at oto dot dyn dot ml dot org, egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <m0zNRH0-000395C@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
> nowhere. The result is everyone wastes time on those bugs which can be
> caught by libg++. Should that be a check-in requirement?
No. It should not be a check-in requirement.
If we ever have check-in requirements, they would include either a
bootstrap of the compiler or running the existing testsuite, not
building/testing external code like libg++.
jeff