This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: __LONG_MAX__

To: Gavin Romig-Koch <gavin at cygnus dot com>, Michael Meissner <meissner at cygnus dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: __LONG_MAX__
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 01:18:00 -0700
Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com, egcs-patches at cygnus dot com
References: <m0zEJ4b-000sBJC@cetus.cygnus.com> <19980902144558.D16848@dot.cygnus.com> <19980902173035.A3103@tiktok.cygnus.com> <m0zES4R-000sBJC@cetus.cygnus.com>
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>

On Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 01:36:35AM -0400, Gavin Romig-Koch wrote:
> Oh, of course, there is no requirement that the integer types have
> the same size (or even the same representation) in the preprocessor.
> Bah.  Sorry.

Which is one of the larger pieces of bogisity perpetrated by the
standard, IMO.  Quality-of-implementation dictates that they be
identical.

r~

References:
- __LONG_MAX__
  - From: Gavin Romig-Koch
- Re: __LONG_MAX__
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: __LONG_MAX__
  - From: Michael Meissner
- Re: __LONG_MAX__
  - From: Gavin Romig-Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]