This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x

To: Jamie Lokier <egcs at tantalophile dot demon dot co dot uk>
Subject: Re: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 14:19:25 -0700
Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
References: <199808231737.KAA16112@dm.cobaltmicro.com> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980823114718.8844R-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <19980824132115.B23380@tantalophile.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>

On Mon, Aug 24, 1998 at 01:21:15PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Hmm.  I also have some patches (code generation and C++ bug fixes,
> better ix86 code for 64-bit arithmetic, __builtin_constant_p in inline
> functions).

A derivitave of your __builtin_constant_p change went in to egcs
about 2 months ago.  Thought you'd be interested to know...

As for 64-bit arithmetic, I posted a diatribe about what needed
to happen IMO to get things working properly.  Most of it had to 
do with disabling half-assed support in the x86 backend and let
the generic code generator handle it.  I'd be interested to see
what you can up with though.

r~

References:
- Re: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: pre egcs-1.1 testing and Linux 2.1.x
  - From: Jamie Lokier

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]