This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: egcs-1.1 prerelease vs egcs-1.0.3a on stock Red Hat 5.1 Alpha
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: egcs-1.1 prerelease vs egcs-1.0.3a on stock Red Hat 5.1 Alpha
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 98 14:59:42 +0200
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9807230947550.11629-100000@markab.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
> In principle, shouldn't one use the _same_ testsuite for
> both versions?
>
> I.e., for these regression tests, shouldn't egcs-1.0.3a
> be tested with the suite from egcs-1.1-tree as well (to
> see how egcs-1.1 has improved) or egcs-1.1-tree tested
> with the suite from egcs-1.0.3a (to check that there
> indeed no regressions in case the suite has changed)?
>
> I understood http://egcs.cygnus.com/regress.html to mean
> the former...
Shiii---iips, you're absolutely right. When I first saw this page
I was so convinced that I wouldn't have access to a system which
both would build egcs-1.1 AND run dejagnu that I basically ignored
Jeff's recipe.
Sorry for the intrusion - I'll try to follow the letter of the law
from now on ...
Thanks for pointing that out,
Toon.