This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Hi, I did some code spelunking to find the -fall-virtual problem.
- To: mrs at wrs dot com
- Subject: Re: Hi, I did some code spelunking to find the -fall-virtual problem.
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at markmitchell dot com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 10:46:22 -0700
- CC: egcs at cygnus dot com, fredrik dot ohrstrom at qvant dot com
- References: <199807020013.RAA25787@kankakee.wrs.com>
- Reply-to: mark at markmitchell dot com
>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Stump <mrs@wrs.com> writes:
Mike> I think I would rather remove -fall-virtual then fix it (or
Mike> have it fixed). Jason, how do you feel?
I'm not Jason, but I agree. This is yet another bit of complexity for
those of us trying to maintain the C++ front-end, and, IMO, with
little value. The fewer extensions the simpler our life becomes and
the more reliable the compiler becomes. The right time to add
extensions is after the whole language is implemented and everything
is working reasonably well.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@markmitchell.com
Mark Mitchell Consulting http://www.markmitchell.com