This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Will the consistent failures in EGCS be fixed soon?
- To: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump)
- Subject: Re: Will the consistent failures in EGCS be fixed soon?
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:37:19 -0600
- cc: richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, rearnsha at sun52 dot arm dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <199806292135.OAA10101@kankakee.wrs.com>you write:
> Yes, they should be. As Jeff pointed out, they don't have the
> infrastructure to mark them precisely. I think the should be marked
> as precisely as possible. Or put another way, we should xfail the
> entire series of sets and have a few extra XPASSes that we can't get
> rid of, then a few unexpected fails that we can't get ride of.
Or we just fix the bugs. I'd be game for xfailing anything from before
1998 (ie the loop-* and some of the varargs/stdarg cases). I'd
prefer to hold off on newer tests since we do have folks working on
fixing them.
jeff