This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Results for haifa-enabled egcs-2.91.42 19980621 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1


Horst von Brand and I both tested 19980621 on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
but got different results for the g++ tests.

Horst gets

> Running target unix
> FAIL: g++.law/code-gen5.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb101.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb129.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb130.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb131.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb56.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)
> 
> 		=== g++ Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes		4165
> # of unexpected failures	7
> # of expected failures		86
> # of untested testcases		6

I get

FAIL: g++.robertl/eb101.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb129.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb130.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb131.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb56.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		4167
# of unexpected failures	6
# of expected failures		85
# of untested testcases		6

I have one fewer failure.  But I don't know why I have two more passes.

I did not use --enable-shared ... is this a possible difference?

Horst, what output do you get when you run g++.law/code-gen5.C ?



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]