This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for haifa-enabled egcs-2.91.42 19980621 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
- To: vonbrand at inf dot utfsm dot cl (Horst von Brand)
- Subject: Re: Results for haifa-enabled egcs-2.91.42 19980621 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
- From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 98 10:18:12 PDT
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
Horst von Brand and I both tested 19980621 on sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1
but got different results for the g++ tests.
Horst gets
> Running target unix
> FAIL: g++.law/code-gen5.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb101.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb129.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb130.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb131.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb56.C (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)
>
> === g++ Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 4165
> # of unexpected failures 7
> # of expected failures 86
> # of untested testcases 6
I get
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb101.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb129.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb130.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb131.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb56.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 4167
# of unexpected failures 6
# of expected failures 85
# of untested testcases 6
I have one fewer failure. But I don't know why I have two more passes.
I did not use --enable-shared ... is this a possible difference?
Horst, what output do you get when you run g++.law/code-gen5.C ?