This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 20:30:24 +0200
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
At 21:01 07.06.98 , Franz Sirl wrote:
>Am Sun, 07 Jun 1998 schrieb David Edelsohn:
>>>>>>> Franz Sirl writes:
>>
>>Franz> Ok, so I will have to wait a bit for a solution. I would
appreciate if fixing
>>Franz> that won't take too long, cause it already hit me with a few
compiles (glibc the
>>Franz> most important one).
>>
>> Okay, I think that I have this fixed. Fixing the
>>restore_stack_block pattern pointed out that emit_stack_save() uses
>>VOIDmode as a magic flag, so I had to update the STACK_SAVEAREA_MODE macro
>>as well. If you don't want to rebuild everything, you will need to delete
>>explow.o as the dependency on rs6000.h is not obvious.
>
>Yes, this fixes it, THANKS! (I didn't expect it _that_ fast :-) Currently a
>full check is running, I'll send you the results.
The full check is OK. 921017-1.c is gone and no other regressions showed up.
>While staring at last check results, I noticed another potential regression.
>It's execute/980526-1.c with "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-finline-functions", but
>I'm not really sure about it and it didn't cause me any problems yet. I
>overlooked it, cause it looks so similar to the usual failing test
980526-2.c.
Forget about this one, it's not caused by your patches, was already there
with 2.91.33.
Franz.