This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 21:01:41 +0200
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
Am Sun, 07 Jun 1998 schrieb David Edelsohn:
>>>>>> Franz Sirl writes:
>
>Franz> Ok, so I will have to wait a bit for a solution. I would appreciate if fixing
>Franz> that won't take too long, cause it already hit me with a few compiles (glibc the
>Franz> most important one).
>
> Okay, I think that I have this fixed. Fixing the
>restore_stack_block pattern pointed out that emit_stack_save() uses
>VOIDmode as a magic flag, so I had to update the STACK_SAVEAREA_MODE macro
>as well. If you don't want to rebuild everything, you will need to delete
>explow.o as the dependency on rs6000.h is not obvious.
Yes, this fixes it, THANKS! (I didn't expect it _that_ fast :-) Currently a
full check is running, I'll send you the results.
While staring at last check results, I noticed another potential regression.
It's execute/980526-1.c with "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions", but
I'm not really sure about it and it didn't cause me any problems yet. I
overlooked it, cause it looks so similar to the usual failing test 980526-2.c.
Thanks again,
Franz.