This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.91.34 19980605 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental) testsuite on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 11:20:41 +0200
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
Am Sun, 07 Jun 1998 schrieb David Edelsohn:
>>>>>> Franz Sirl writes:
>
>Franz> the testsuite results after David's checkin, the only regressions are the
>Franz> 921017-1.c FAILs.
>
> Yeah, I hadn't gotten around to that failure yet. I bet that is
>do to the restore_stack_block pattern change. I'll have to think about
>the best way to get around this change.
>
> "rs6000" was lucky enough to be one of the few ports that needed
>that pattern because the calling convention maintains both the stack
>pointer and the backchain. The pattern previously made assumptions about
>the size of the pointer which I had to remove for 64-bit support, but now
>it doesn't know the mode of the MEM.
Ok, so I will have to wait a bit for a solution. I would appreciate if fixing
that won't take too long, cause it already hit me with a few compiles (glibc the
most important one).
Thanks,
Franz.