This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Your change to jump.c breaks conditional move?


On Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 12:22:45AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> The address could be a SYMBOL_REF, (CONST (PLUS (SYMBOL_REF) (CONST_INT)),
> LABEL_REF or even a CONST_INT.

CONST_INT?  Really?  I can't imagine leaving symbolics behind
before assembly.  Though I agree with the other two.

> I'm also not sure checking for PLUS/MINUS is enough either since
> some PIC implementations use LO_SUM instead of PLUS to add the 
> pic register to the lower bits of a symbolic address.

Yes, but if it's LO_SUM we won't get into trouble below like we
will for PLUS.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]