This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: egcs-19980531 on i586-pc-linux-gnu test results


>>>>> Horst von Brand writes:

 > linux-2.1.104-1, glibc-2.0.93, binutils-2.9.1.0.6, dejagnu-980528
 > {,LIB}{C,CXX,F77}FLAGS = -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=pentium

 > --enable-{shared,threads,haifa} --prefix=/usr i586-redhat-linux

 > [...]

 > rdbzmain.o: In function `main':
 > rdbzmain.o(.text+0x2ef): undefined reference to `_IO_sscanf'
 > rdbzmain.o(.text+0x31d): undefined reference to `_IO_sscanf'
 > rdbzmain.o(.text+0x3ec): undefined reference to `_IO_fprintf'
 > rdbzmain.o(.text+0x3fb): undefined reference to `_IO_fprintf'
 > rdbzmain.o(.text+0x52a): undefined reference to `_IO_printf'

 > (There are lots and lots of those, refering to _IO_ftell, _IO_fgets,
 > _IO_fputs, _IO_fwrite, _IO_fread, _IO_printf, _IO_setvbuf, _IO_ungetc,
 > _IO_fflush, _IO_fflush). Looks like stdio went south for keeps... strange
 > that the compiler even works with this.

 > I won't even try the linux-kernel-compilation test after this disaster...

Nothing to fear.  There's no problem with egcs here.

That's a problem which was introduced in glibc 2.0.93 but doesn't
exist in 2.0.94 anymore.  I'm sending you by separate email patches
for glibc 2.0.93 which are already in 2.0.94.  The problem is that we
forgot to export those functions which only showed up in 2.0.93 due to
changes to libc.so (using and installing libc_nonshared.a instead of
libc.a).

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger   aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de    jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
  for pgp-key finger ajaeger@alma.student.uni-kl.de


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]