This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Hannu Koivisto <azure@iki.fi> writes: > void(kala ( 10, 'a' )); > void(kala2 ()); According to the FDIS [stmt.ambig], these are to be parsed as a declarations, not function calls. The first declares an object named `kala', initialized with two arguments, which turns out to be invalid because it has type void, but disambiguation is syntactic. The second declares a function named kala2, that takes an empty list of arguments and returns void. > void(::kala ( 10, 'a' )); > void(::kala2 ()); IMHO, these should also be considered declarations, but egcs considers these function invocations. The first should be an invalid definition of an object `kala' in the global namespace, while the second would be a valid redeclaration of global function `kala2'. -- Alexandre Oliva mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |