This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++-2.8.1 - Ready for testing
- To: hjl at lucon dot org, drepper at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: libstdc++-2.8.1 - Ready for testing
- From: Manfred Hollstein <manfred at s-direktnet dot de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:00:50 +0100
- Cc: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, gcc2 at cygnus dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com
- References: <199802221029.LAA00991@saturn.s-direktnet.de><m0y71Zo-00058gC@ocean.lucon.org>
- Reply-To: Manfred Hollstein <manfred at s-direktnet dot de>
On Mon, 23 February 1998, 09:22:00, hjl@lucon.org wrote:
> >
> > Of course, they were not :-( Your patches for make check with gcc dir missing
> > were not in. I'm just uploading a new version libstdc++-2.8.1-980222 and will
> > delete yesterday's one. Sorry for the confusion.
> >
>
> There is a new libio patch for glibc 2.1 submitted for egcs. Ulrich
> should know if it is correct.
Do you mean this one?
On , 23 February 1998, 11:16:40, schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de wrote:
> This patch fixes some problems in libio in connection with glibc 2.1.
> Note that the change of _IO_wchar_t is a binary incompatibility, so users
> of glibc 2.1 snapshots need to recompile at least all code that uses
> [io]fstream.
>
>
> 1998-02-22 Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
>
> Changes for _G_IO_IO_FILE_VERSION == 0x20001:
> * libioP.h (_IO_showmanyc_t, _IO_SHOWMANYC, _IO_imbue_t,
> _IO_IMBUE): New definitions.
> (struct _IO_jump_t): Add __showmanyc and __imbue fields.
> (_IO_file_fopen): Add new fourth argument.
> * filebuf.cc (filebuf::open): Pass new fourth argument to
> _IO_file_fopen.
> * iolibio.h (_IO_freopen): Likewise.
> * streambuf.cc (streambuf::showmanyc, streambuf::imbue): New
> functions.
> * streambuf.h (_IO_wchar_t): Define to _G_wchar_t.
> (ios::fill): Remove casts.
> (struct streambuf): Add showmanyc and imbue members.
>
> * iostream.cc (ostream::operator<<(double n)) [__GLIBC_MINOR__ >=
> 1]: Initialize new fields is_char of struct printf_info.
> (ostream::operator<<(long double n)) [__GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 1]:
> Likewise.
Ulrich, is it ok to apply?
Thanks
Manfred