Re: Implications of tighter integration of libg++

[hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)]

> 
> > say "using namespace std;" as that imports all names.  Rather, just
> > things like
> > 
> > using std::istream;
> > using std::ostream;
> > using std::cin;
> > using std::cout;
> > using std::cerr;
> 
> This does not solve the problem I'm talking about. With that scheme,
> and the implementation of namespace I have in mind, names would still
> come out as Q23std7istream, rather than 7istream as they do now. This
> is because the compiler would always resolve names to the place where
> they are actually introduced, regardless of any using and typedef
> magic applied.
> 
> So, even if old sources would still compile, old objects would not
> link anymore. This is especially bad in presence of shared libraries
> which have to accomodate both sets of header files.

That can be done via symbol alias.

> 
> Therefore, I think there is some value to the proposal of installing
> libg++ in the compiler-specific directories.
> 

I think that is no good. It is the same as make libgcc shared.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)