This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [?] iostream vs. iostream.h
- To: "Houssam Moustafa" <hmoustafa at bridge dot com>, <egcs at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [?] iostream vs. iostream.h
- From: cdern at pre dot com (Chris Dern)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 16:29:03 -0800
Please correct me if i'm wrong, but here is my understanding.
the iostream include, is the new convention, when using namespace.
As far as I know, both gcc and egcs don't support this yet. However to
"ease" the
transition into the new convention. gcc includes iostream, yet if you look
at it, I believe that it just includes iostream.h for now.
Chris
----------
> From: Houssam Moustafa <hmoustafa@bridge.com>
> To: egcs@cygnus.com
> Subject: [?] iostream vs. iostream.h
> Date: Friday, January 30, 1998 11:10 AM
>
> stroustrup's 3rd ed. only includes "iostream", not "iostream.h".
>
> so how come egcs 1.0 and gcc 2.8.0 have both "iostream" and
> "iostream.h", but egcs 1.0.1 only has "iostream.h"?
>
> houssam