This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: one tree builds
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: one tree builds
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 22:17:03 -0600 (CST)
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.971125214303.4794B-100000@vespucci.advicom.net>you
> write:
> > > This would make me wonder if you're picking up the right assembler --
> > > is the "as" link in the gcc dir pointing to the right place (keeping in
> > > mind the as.new -> as-new transition a little while back).
> >
> > I am sure I am not picking up the right assembler.
> >
> > My binutils is 2.8.1 and it is creating as.new while egcs is looking for
> > as-new. It looks like the same problem applies to at least ld and nm as
> > well.
> Yup, it applies to ld & nm to
I will fix it in my copy of binutiols in the morning and see how much
father I can get. :)
>
> > Is this something that has changed in binutils since the 2.8.1 release and
> > I need to change my binutils to create XYZ-new?
> Yes. Or change gcc to look for XYZ.new
>
> I think this deserves a mention in the FAQ :-)
And possibly a synchronized binutils/crossgcc release as well.
What does the --enable-newlib option do? Should I be using it on the
rtems configurations?
--joel