This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: one tree builds





On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>   In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.971125214303.4794B-100000@vespucci.advicom.net>you 
> write:
>   > > This would make me wonder if you're picking up the right assembler --
>   > > is the "as" link in the gcc dir pointing to the right place (keeping in
>   > > mind the as.new -> as-new transition a little while back).
>   > 
>   > I am sure I am not picking up the right assembler.  
>   > 
>   > My binutils is 2.8.1 and it is creating as.new while egcs is looking for
>   > as-new.  It looks like the same problem applies to at least ld and nm as
>   > well.
> Yup, it applies to ld & nm to

I will fix it in my copy of binutiols in the morning and see how much
father I can get. :)
> 
>   > Is this something that has changed in binutils since the 2.8.1 release and
>   > I need to change my binutils to create XYZ-new?
> Yes.  Or change gcc to look for XYZ.new
> 
> I think this deserves a mention in the FAQ :-)

And possibly a synchronized binutils/crossgcc release as well.

What does the --enable-newlib option do?  Should I be using it on the
rtems configurations?

--joel



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]