This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: basic_string<char,string_char_traits<char> >::npos ? [fwd]
- To: leo at lspace dot org, egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: basic_string<char,string_char_traits<char> >::npos ? [fwd]
- From: Max Lawson <mlawson at drfmc dot ceng dot cea dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 15:31:49 +0200
I'm forwarding your solution to the egcs-list (egcs@cygnus.com), it may help
some :).
Bye.
----- Begin Included Message -----
>From leo@pds.twi.tudelft.nl Thu Oct 9 14:03 MET 1997
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:03:43 +0200
From: Leo Breebaart <leo@lspace.org>
To: Max Lawson <mlawson@drfmc.ceng.cea.fr>
Subject: Re: basic_string<char,string_char_traits<char> >::npos ?
Mime-Version: 1.0
> After having applied the patched, the order of inclusion no more matters,
> but the executables built are segfaulting ..
Exactly. My current solution is to use the 971008 snapshot, but to simply
replace the entire libstc++ directory by the one from the 970929 snapshot.
Works like a charm, since the string thing was the only thing that was
changed in libstdc++ in between the two snapshots.
----- End Included Message -----