Re: internal compiler error in C++ front end

[Jason Merrill <jason at cygnus dot com>]

>>>>> Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

> It seems that there is some confusion between vector<T>(size_type,const T&)
> and the template member vector<T>(Iterator,Iterator).  The odd thing
> is that for vector<int>(32,3) the second seems in some ways a better match,
> but STL is banking on the first one being chosen! (to get a vector of
> 32 elements with value 3).

I believe the plan is to make the second one DTRT in this case.

> While it's likely that this particular case would not have been
> caught, this does suggest that the libstdc++ tests are too weak; tvector
> does not try out even 1/10 of the vector class functionality.  Tests that
> at least call each method of vector (and the other STL classes) at least
> once would be a great help.  (Perhaps others already have something: the
> ObjectSpace free tests seem too weak).

Yep.  Contributions welcome.

Jason