This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: A new alpha bug
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: A new alpha bug
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 18:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: rth at cygnus dot com (Richard Henderson)
> complex_double (double r = 0, double i = 0): re (r), im (i) { }
[...]
> complex_double one = 1.0;
I don't think this does what you think it does. What it doesn't
do is call the constructor listed.
I'll leave it to those who can actually remember what the rules
concerning that equals sign are to determine if this is a bug in
the C++ front end or whether your code is wrong.
r~