This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: testing consistency


> Consider what happens if HP sends you a compiler upgrade for your HP machine.
> Does it go into /usr/local?  No.  It goes in /usr.

The correspondong scenario is a Debian/RedHat/Slackware *binary package*.
That is of course installed into /usr.

> On the other hand, an end user must install into /usr, 
> otherwise, they haven't actually upgraded the compiler on their system.

End users should only compile from source as a last resort.
Otherwise, they should get an updated package from Debian/RedHat/Slackware.

> It is generally preferable to make things harder for the developer, since 
> they are expected to be able to deal with any problems. 

Agreed.  And it is more difficult if gcc is installed in /usr,
for any Linux system based on Debian/RedHat/Slackware, unless
it is installed as a package upgrade.

	--Per Bothner
Cygnus Solutions     bothner@cygnus.com     http://www.cygnus.com/~bothner


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]