This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
gcc 5.1.0 x86_64
- From: brahim brahim <brahimalekhine at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:40:14 +0200
- Subject: gcc 5.1.0 x86_64
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
Hello,
I have a lot of fails. The summary is more than 100 KB. Is it safe for
me to use gcc 5.1.0, or should I fall back to an older version?
Below some reports.
Thanks
Brahim
~/opt/soft/gcc/build$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/
brahim/opt/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.1.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/brahim/opt/
--with-gmp=/home/brahim/opt/ --with-mpfr=/home/brahim/opt/
--with-mpc=/home/brahim/opt/ --with-cloog=/home/brahim/opt/
--with-isl=/home/brahim/opt/ --enable-plugin --enable-gold
--enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--enable-lto --enable-libsanitizer --with-arch-64=native
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.1.0 (GCC)
~/opt/soft/gcc/build$ uname -a
Linux nuts 2.6.18-400.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Thu Dec 18 00:59:53 EST 2014
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 92394
# of unexpected failures 796
# of expected failures 341
# of unsupported tests 3673
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 117172
# of unexpected failures 546
# of unexpected successes 18
# of expected failures 278
# of unsupported tests 1962
/home/brahim/opt/soft/gcc/build/gcc/xgcc version 5.1.0 (GCC)
=== libatomic Summary ===
# of expected passes 27
# of unexpected failures 27
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 105492
# of unexpected failures 546
# of unexpected successes 18
# of expected failures 182
# of unsupported tests 1661