This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Results for 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) testsuite on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


Native configuration is hppa64-hp-hpux11.11

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		77673
# of expected failures		243
# of unsupported tests		3742
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++  version 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 

		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c   -O2 -flto  (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c   -O2 -flto  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -Os  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c   -O2 -flto  execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr37289.c scan-tree-dump original "-\\\\(long unsigned int\\\\) x"
XPASS: gcc.dg/sibcall-3.c execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/sibcall-4.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c  (test for warnings, line 18)
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/peel-1.c scan-rtl-dump loop2_unroll "Considering simply peeling loop"

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		82491
# of unexpected failures	17
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		123
# of unresolved testcases	1
# of unsupported tests		1859
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc  version 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 

		=== gfortran tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_2.f90 -fcoarray=single  -O2  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/atomic_2.f90 -fcoarray=single  -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O0  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O1  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O2  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -Os  (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90   -Os  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90   -Os  execution test

		=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes		45141
# of unexpected failures	26
# of expected failures		55
# of unsupported tests		411
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran  version 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 

		=== obj-c++ tests ===


Running target unix

		=== obj-c++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		1439
# of expected failures		10
# of unsupported tests		86
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../xg++  version 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		3008
# of unsupported tests		75
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc  version 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 

		=== libatomic tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libatomic Summary ===

# of expected passes		44
# of unsupported tests		5
		=== libgomp tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes		3626
# of unsupported tests		118
		=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		8516
# of expected failures		68
# of unsupported tests		951

Compiler version: 5.0.0 20141129 (experimental) [trunk revision 218178] (GCC) 
Platform: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
configure flags:Test Run By dave on Sat Nov 29 15:20:22 2014


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]