This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 4.1.0 20050309 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <chj at j-son dot org>
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:55:39 +0100
- Subject: Results for 4.1.0 20050309 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5
bison-1.875c-2 - sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2 - noarch
expect-5.42.1-1 - sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 - sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc - sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc - sparc
kernel-2.6.10-1.1110sparc18 - sparc64
package kernel-smp is not installed
make-3.80-5 - sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
tcl-8.4.7-2 - sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Mar 9 12:59:45 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c32001e
FAIL: c391002
FAIL: c432002
FAIL: c43214c
FAIL: c52011a
FAIL: c64105b
FAIL: c95086b
FAIL: cd2b11a
FAIL: cd2b11b
FAIL: cxa4006
FAIL: cxa4017
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes 2309
# of unexpected failures 11
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr15784-4.c scan-tree-dump ~x;
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr15784-4.c scan-tree-dump -x;
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 32908
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 102
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 495
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc version 4.1.0 20050309 (experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 10723
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 70
# of unsupported tests 89
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.1.0 20050309 (experimental)
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass54-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail17-frag.c (-static) (test for excess errors)
WARNING: libmudflap.c/fail17-frag.c (-static) compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass54-frag.c (-static) execution test
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes 1283
# of unexpected failures 3
=== libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary ===
# of added symbols: 65
# of missing symbols: 0
# of incompatible symbols: 0
using: /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3616
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 8
Compiler version: 4.1.0 20050309 (experimental)
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,ada,c++
Counting all warnings,
there are 90 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
28 libmudflap/mf-hooks1.c
25 libiberty/concat.c
15 libiberty/regex.c
6 libmudflap/mf-runtime.c
6 libmudflap/mf-hooks3.c
5 include/xregex2.h
2 raise.c
2 libiberty/pex-unix.c
1 libmath/stubs.c
Number of warning types:
34 \`???' aliased to undefined symbol \`???'
25 traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions
15 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
3 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
2 variable \`???' might be clobbered by \`???' or \`???'
2 pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
2 format \`???' expects type \`???', but argument 6 has type \`???'
2 format \`???' expects type \`???', but argument 4 has type \`???'
2 format \`???' expects type \`???', but argument 15 has type \`???'
1 incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function \`???'
Counting all warnings,
there are 7 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
4 gcc/gcc.c
3 gengtype-lex.c
Number of warning types:
4 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
3 old-style function definition