This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: ahs3 at fcahs3 dot fc dot hp dot com (Al Stone)
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:23:32 -0600 (MDT)
- Subject: Results for 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 26 06:43:27 UTC 2004
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c compilation, -Os
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-4.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution, -Os
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline
FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-20040816-2.c scan-tree-dump-times Applying if-conversion 1
FAIL: 96:is -:should be 1
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-4.c gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 30993
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 114
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 271
/opt/toolchain/i686/obj/gcc/gcc/xgcc version 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE:
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .section[^\\n\\r]*_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE[^\\n\\r]*
FAIL: 102:is -:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/crash3.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 10186
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 78
# of unsupported tests 49
/opt/toolchain/i686/obj/gcc/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental)
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 2899
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 5
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE:
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .section[^\\n\\r]*_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE[^\\n\\r]*
FAIL: 102:is -:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/crash3.C (test for excess errors)
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 10186
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 78
# of unsupported tests 49
/opt/toolchain/i686/obj/gcc/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c compilation, -Os
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution, -Os
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-4.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-4.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution, -Os
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline
FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-20040816-2.c scan-tree-dump-times Applying if-conversion 1
FAIL: 96:is -:should be 1
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-4.c gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 30993
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 114
# of unresolved testcases 2
# of untested testcases 28
# of unsupported tests 271
/opt/toolchain/i686/obj/gcc/gcc/xgcc version 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental)
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 2899
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 5
Compiler version: 4.0.0 20040926 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --enable-shared --program-suffix=-main --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --prefix=/opt/toolchain/i686 --enable-languages=c,c++
Counting all warnings,
there are 9 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
5 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
3 gcc/gcc.c
1 gcc/libgcc2.c
Number of warning types:
4 source missing a mode?
1 string length '844' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
1 string length '695' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
1 string length '608' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of '__udivmoddi4' differ in signedness
1 operand 1 missing mode?