This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 versus gcc 3.2.2-20030203 for gdb
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:39:18 -0600
- Subject: Comparison of gcc 3.2.1 versus gcc 3.2.2-20030203 for gdb
[Gabriel Dos Reis recommended I post this here too].
I'm a gdb guy. I run regular regression tests on gdb with a variety of gdb
versions, gcc versions, and binutils versions, and analyze the results.
I am happy to report that a comparison of gcc 3.2.1 and gcc 3.2.2-20030203
showed no regressions in gdb behavior. This is on native i686-pc-linux-gnu
with both dwarf-2 and stabs+.
My test matrix was:
target => native
host => i686-pc-linux-gnu
osversion => red-hat-8.0
gdb => 5.3, gdb_5_3-branch%20030205, HEAD%20030205
gcc => 2.95.3, 3.2-7-rh, 3.2.1, 3.2.2-20030203, gcc-3_2-branch%20030204, gcc-3_3-branch%20030204, HEAD%20030204
binutils => 184.108.40.206.2-rh, 220.127.116.11, HEAD%20030204
libc => 2.2.93-5-rh
gformat => dwarf-2, stabs+
count 114 = 1 * 1 * 1 * 3 * (6*3+1*1) * 1 * 2
(I'm not sure if I should post this to gcc or gcc-testresults,
as gcc-testresults looks it's all automated results for gcc).