This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Results for 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease) testsuite on alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f


Native configuration is alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 22)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 19)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate3.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.pt/instantiate5.C (test for excess errors)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6483
# of unexpected failures	12
# of expected failures		92
# of unresolved testcases	1
# of untested testcases		20
/tmp_mnt/n/test/log/cotia/.ltmp/gcc-3.0.2-20011014/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		933
# of unsupported tests		8
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c (test for excess errors)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		15253
# of unexpected failures	1
# of expected failures		81
# of unsupported tests		56
/tmp_mnt/n/test/log/cotia/.ltmp/gcc-3.0.2-20011014/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		153
# of expected failures		1
/tmp_mnt/n/test/log/cotia/.ltmp/gcc-3.0.2-20011014/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease)


Compiler version: 3.0.2 20011014 (prerelease)
 
Platform: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f

BOOT_CFLAGS: -g -O9 -W -Wall

Counting all warnings,
there are 78 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     13	gcc/mips-tfile.c
      6	gcc/f/com.c
      6	gcc/cp/pt.c
      5	gcc/cp/error.c
      5	gcc/cp/call.c
      4	gcc/except.c
      4	gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c
      3	gcc/reload1.c
      2	gcc/varasm.c
      2	gcc/reload.c
      2	gcc/gcc.c
      2	gcc/expr.c
      1	gcc/unwind-dw2.c
      1	gcc/sdbout.c
      1	gcc/sched-deps.c
      1	gcc/regmove.c
      1	gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/jump.c
      1	gcc/java/jvspec.c
      1	gcc/java/jcf-write.c
      1	gcc/java/jcf-depend.c
      1	gcc/intl/dcgettext.c
      1	gcc/fold-const.c
      1	gcc/flow.c
      1	gcc/final.c
      1	gcc/f/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/dwarf2out.c
      1	gcc/cppexp.c
      1	gcc/cp/typeck2.c
      1	gcc/cp/method.c
      1	gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/cp/errfn.c
      1	gcc/cp/class.c
      1	gcc/combine.c
      1	gcc/collect2.c
      1	gcc/builtins.c

Number of warning types:
     21	comparison between signed and unsigned
     13	`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
      9	??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
      7	cast from pointer to integer of different size
      6	string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      5	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      5	initialization from incompatible pointer type
      3	unused variable `???'
      2	function declaration isn't a prototype
      1	suggest not using #elif in traditional C
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
      1	missing initializer
      1	assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
      1	`long' switch expression not converted to `int' in ISO C
      1	`???' declared `static' but never defined
      1	(near initialization for `???')


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]