This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Results for 3.0.2 20010915 (prerelease) testsuite on mips-sgi-irix6.5


With changes to testsuite:
* set LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH externally
* set LD_LIBRARY64_PATH externally
* don't set LD_LIBRARYN32_PATH in g++.exp or objc.exp
* don't set LD_LIBRARY64_PATH in g++.exp or objc.exp

These changes enable the testsuite to run, but are not 
the permanent solution.  One possible solution is 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-11/msg01537.html

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 16 01:39:34 2001

Native configuration is mips-sgi-irix6.5

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes		933
# of unsupported tests		8

Running target unix/-mabi=64

		=== g77 Summary for unix/-mabi=64 ===

# of expected passes		933
# of unsupported tests		8

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		1866
# of unsupported tests		16
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -Os  

		=== gcc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes		15211
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		104
# of unsupported tests		57

Running target unix/-mabi=64
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991014-1.c compilation,  -Os 

		=== gcc Summary for unix/-mabi=64 ===

# of expected passes		15199
# of unexpected failures	8
# of expected failures		104
# of unresolved testcases	6
# of unsupported tests		57

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		30410
# of unexpected failures	10
# of expected failures		208
# of unresolved testcases	6
# of unsupported tests		114
/exd4/billingd/obj/gcc-3.0/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.2 20010915 (prerelease)

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 22)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes		6477
# of unexpected failures	2
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		111
# of untested testcases		21

Running target unix/-mabi=64
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 22)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/thunk3.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary for unix/-mabi=64 ===

# of expected passes		6477
# of unexpected failures	2
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		111
# of untested testcases		21

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		12954
# of unexpected failures	4
# of unexpected successes	4
# of expected failures		222
# of untested testcases		42
/exd4/billingd/obj/gcc-3.0/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.0.2 20010915
(prerelease)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary for unix ===

# of expected passes		153
# of expected failures		1

Running target unix/-mabi=64
FAIL: objc/execute/bycopy-3.m execution,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-5.m execution,  -O 

		=== objc Summary for unix/-mabi=64 ===

# of expected passes		151
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		1

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		304
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		2
/exd4/billingd/obj/gcc-3.0/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.2 20010915 (prerelease)

		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 27_io/ostream_inserter_arith.cc execution test

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		246
# of unexpected failures	1
# of unexpected successes	1
# of expected failures		7
		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 27_io/ostream_inserter_arith.cc execution test

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		246
# of unexpected failures	1
# of unexpected successes	1
# of expected failures		7

Compiler version: 3.0.2 20010915 (prerelease) 
Platform: mips-sgi-irix6.5
configure flags: --host=mips-sgi-irix6.5 --enable-shared --enable-haifa
--enable-threads=single --prefix=/exd4/billingd/tmp/gcc-3.0
Counting all warnings,
there are 124 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
  27 gcc/combine.c
  11 gcc/config/mips/mips.c
  10 gcc/config/mips/mips.md
   9 gcc/config/mips/irix6-libc-compat.c
   6 gcc/gcc.c
   6 gcc/cse.c
   6 gcc/cp/pt.c
   5 gcc/expr.c
   5 gcc/cp/error.c
   5 gcc/cp/call.c
   4 gcc/reload1.c
   4 gcc/except.c
   2 gcc/unwind-dw2.c
   2 gcc/reload.c
   2 gcc/function.c
   2 gcc/fold-const.c
   2 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
   2 gcc/alias.c
   1 gcc/sched-deps.c
   1 gcc/reorg.c
   1 gcc/regmove.c
   1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
   1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
   1 gcc/intl/dcgettext.c
   1 gcc/gcse.c
   1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
   1 gcc/flow.c
   1 gcc/final.c
   1 gcc/expmed.c
   1 gcc/dwarf2out.c
   1 gcc/cp/typeck2.c
   1 gcc/cp/errfn.c

Number of warning types:
  51 comparison between signed and unsigned
  16 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
  16 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
  11 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89
compilers are required to support
   9 no previous prototype for \`???'
   6 operand 1 missing mode?
   5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
   4 operand 0 missing mode?
   1 \`/*' within comment
   1 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
   1 suggest not using #elif in traditional C
   1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
   1 implicit declaration of function \`???'
   1 function declaration isn't a prototype


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]