This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Results for 3.1 20010807 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu


Source:   gcc MAIN branch (last updated 2001 Aug 08  04:02  +0300)
System:   Linux kernel 2.4.7
          glibc-2.2.3
          binutils-2.11.90.0.8

LAST_UPDATED: Wed Aug  8 01:02:49 UTC 2001

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.other/enum5.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.robertl/eb17.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6596
# of unexpected failures	1
# of unexpected successes	1
# of expected failures		86
# of untested testcases		9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20010807 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		1317
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c,  -Os  
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -O0 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -O1 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -O2 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -O3 -g 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution,  -Os 
XPASS: gcc.dg/setjmp-1.c spurious clobbered warning (test for bogus messages, line 16)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c90-printf-1.c %s with NULL (test for warnings, line 236)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c90-printf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-printf-1.c %hhn plain char (test for warnings, line 195)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-printf-1.c %hhn unsigned char (test for warnings, line 196)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-printf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcov-3.c:4:is 2:should be 1 (PRMS 8294)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		15671
# of unexpected failures	7
# of unexpected successes	7
# of expected failures		65
# of unsupported tests		23
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010807 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O 

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		202
# of unexpected failures	1
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010807 (experimental)

		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		281
# of expected failures		10

Compiler version: 3.1 20010807 (experimental) 
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix

Counting all warnings,
there are 59 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     23	gcc/combine.c
      6	gcc/cp/pt.c
      5	gcc/cse.c
      5	gcc/cp/error.c
      3	gcc/gcc.c
      3	gcc/config/i386/i386.c
      2	gcc/tlink.c
      2	gcc/fold-const.c
      2	gcc/emit-rtl.c
      1	gcc/unwind-dw2.c
      1	gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/flow.c
      1	gcc/final.c
      1	gcc/f/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/expmed.c
      1	gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/cp/errfn.c

Number of warning types:
     39	comparison between signed and unsigned
      6	string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      5	initialization from incompatible pointer type
      3	unused variable `???'
      2	passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
      1	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
      1	function declaration isn't a prototype
      1	`???' might be used uninitialized in this function


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]