This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.1 20010719 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Results for 3.1 20010719 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Andris Pavenis <andris at hal dot astr dot lu dot lv>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:12:16 +0300
Source: gcc MAIN branch (last updated 2001 Jul 20 04:03 +0300)
System: Linux kernel 2.4.6
glibc-2.2.3
binutils-2.11.90.0.8
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.other/enum5.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.robertl/eb17.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6553
# of unexpected failures 2
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 85
# of untested testcases 9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20010719 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 1035
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000707-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/unused-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c %hhu sign (test for warnings, line 144)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 111)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for excess errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15644
# of unexpected failures 9
# of expected failures 72
# of unsupported tests 23
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010719 (experimental)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 185
# of unexpected failures 1
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010719 (experimental)
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 279
# of expected failures 10
Compiler version: 3.1 20010719 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix
Counting all warnings,
there are 178 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
110 cc1
23 gcc/combine.c
6 gcc/cse.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
4 gcc/gcov.c
3 gcc/simplify-rtx.c
3 gcc/gcc.c
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
2 gcc/tlink.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/emit-rtl.c
1 gcc/unwind-dw2.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/flow.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 gcc/cp/class.c
Number of warning types:
55 changing search order for system directory `include'
55 as it has already been specified as a system directory
39 comparison between signed and unsigned
6 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
4 traditional C rejects string concatenation
3 unused variable `???'
2 variable `???' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork'
2 passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
1 unused parameter `???'
1 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 argument `???' might be clobbered by `longjmp' or `vfork'