This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.1 20010609 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Results for 3.1 20010609 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Andris Pavenis <andris at hal dot astr dot lu dot lv>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:09:06 +0300
Source: gcc MAIN branch (last updated 2001 Jun 10 04:01 +0300)
System: Linux kernel 2.4.3-ac3
glibc-2.2.3
binutils-2.11.90.0.8
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Multivv3, 0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*VTT for Multivv3, 0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Multiss2, vtable for Base2
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Multivs1, vtable for Base2
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*VTT for Multivs1, vtable for Base2
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Multisv0, vtable for Side0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*VTT for Multisv0, vtable for Side0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Side0, 0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for VbasedA, 0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*VTT for VbasedA, 0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Base2, vtable for Base1
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Base1, vtable for Base0
XPASS: g++.dg/vtgc1.C scan-assembler .vtable_inherit[ ]*vtable for Base0, 0
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
XPASS: g++.other/crash27.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/stepanov_v1p2.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6516
# of unexpected failures 2
# of unexpected successes 15
# of expected failures 86
# of untested testcases 9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20010609 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 983
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/990628-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c compilation, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-complex-1.c compilation, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c bad %-0 (test for warnings, line 212)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c bad %_0 (test for warnings, line 213)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c bad %^# (test for warnings, line 215)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/mg.c
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15538
# of unexpected failures 17
# of expected failures 72
# of unresolved testcases 8
# of unsupported tests 21
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010609 (experimental)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 149
# of unexpected failures 1
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20010609 (experimental)
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 243
# of expected failures 8
Compiler version: 3.1 20010609 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix
Counting all warnings,
there are 108 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
27 gcc/combine.c
6 insn-output.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/cse.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
5 gcc/cp/call.c
4 gcc/reg-stack.c
4 gcc/expr.c
4 gcc/except.c
4 gcc/dwarf2out.c
4 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
3 gcc/reload1.c
3 gcc/reload.c
3 gcc/gcc.c
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/flow.c
2 gcc/final.c
2 gcc/alias.c
1 insn-recog.c
1 gcc/unwind-dw2.c
1 gcc/simplify-rtx.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/cp/init.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 gcc/cp/class.c
Number of warning types:
54 comparison between signed and unsigned
17 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
6 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
5 integer overflow in expression
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
3 unused variable `???'
2 implicit declaration of function `???'
2 function declaration isn't a prototype
2 destination missing a mode?
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 passing arg ??? of `???' from incompatible pointer type
1 operand 0 missing mode?
1 large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
1 control reaches end of non-void function
1 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)