This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Results for 2.97 20001129 (experimental) testsuite on sparc-sun-solaris2.8


Native configuration is sparc-sun-solaris2.8

		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O0  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O1  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930622-2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930622-2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930622-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930622-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960215-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/regstack-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/if-2.c wide charconst recognition (test for bogus messages, line 9)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001013-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001117-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c sequence point warning (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.dg/ultrasp2.c (test for excess errors)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		13029
# of unexpected failures	23
# of expected failures		75
# of unresolved testcases	3
# of unsupported tests		48
/export/home/lucier/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001129 (experimental)

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/initp1.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate3.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.other/crash18.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.pt/static11.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb130.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb132.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb39.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb73.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6100
# of unexpected failures	17
# of expected failures		101
# of untested testcases		17
/export/home/lucier/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.97 20001129 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		877
		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-1.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-10.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-11.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-12.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-13.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-14.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-15.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-16.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-17.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-18.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-19.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-2.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-20.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-3.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-4.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-5.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-6.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-7.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-8.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/bf-9.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/fdecl.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/string1.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/string2.m compilation,  -O 

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		2
# of unexpected failures	25
# of untested testcases		25
/export/home/lucier/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001129 (experimental)


Compiler version: 2.97 20001129 (experimental) 
Platform: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
configure flags: --host=sparc-sun-solaris2.8 --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-2.96 --enable-checking=no
Counting all warnings,
there are 108 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
  27 ../../gcc/combine.c
  15 ../../gcc/expr.c
   6 ../../gcc/libgcc2.c
   6 ../../gcc/cse.c
   5 ../../gcc/loop.c
   5 ../../gcc/cp/error.c
   5 ../../gcc/c-common.c
   4 ../../gcc/reload.c
   4 ../../gcc/gcc.c
   4 ../../gcc/dwarf2out.c
   4 ../../gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c
   3 ../../gcc/reload1.c
   2 hashtab.c
   2 ../../gcc/function.c
   2 ../../gcc/fold-const.c
   2 ../../gcc/alias.c
   1 ../../gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
   1 ../../gcc/java/jvspec.c
   1 ../../gcc/haifa-sched.c
   1 ../../gcc/flow.c
   1 ../../gcc/final.c
   1 ../../gcc/f/lang-specs.h
   1 ../../gcc/expmed.c
   1 ../../gcc/dwarfout.c
   1 ../../gcc/cppmain.c
   1 ../../gcc/cppinit.c
   1 ../../gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
   1 ../../gcc/cp/errfn.c

Number of warning types:
  60 comparison between signed and unsigned
  12 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
   9 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
   8 string length \`???' is greater than the minimum length \`???' ISO C89 is required to support
   5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
   4 function declaration isn't a prototype
   2 missing braces around initializer
   2 (near initialization for \`???')
   1 unused variable \`???'
   1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
   1 passing arg ??? of \`???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
   1 integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
   1 implicit declaration of function \`???'
   1 decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]