This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 2.96 20000920 (experimental) testsuite on alpha-redhat-linux-gnu
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Results for 2.96 20000920 (experimental) testsuite on alpha-redhat-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Iseli <chris at ludwig-alpha dot unil dot ch>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 11:10:27 +0200
Native configuration is alpha-redhat-linux-gnu
=== libio tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: tFile.cc compilation
FAIL: tFile.cc compilation -b0
FAIL: tFile.cc compilation -b3
FAIL: tiomisc.cc compilation
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 28
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 8
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -O3 -fssa
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -O3 -fssa
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -O3 -fssa
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O3 -fssa
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -Os
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O0
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O1
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O2
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c func [] arg (test for errors, line 26)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c this function should not get any warnings (test for bogus messages, line 52)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c detect return from tail call (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/mg.c
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 13916
# of unexpected failures 38
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 74
# of unsupported tests 44
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/obj-alpha-linux/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000920 (experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.eh/badalloc1.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.law/cvt2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/virtual3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/crash18.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.other/crash23.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb21.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb77.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5999
# of unexpected failures 8
# of expected failures 98
# of untested testcases 18
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/obj-alpha-linux/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.96 20000920 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 983
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 44
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/obj-alpha-linux/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000920 (experimental)
Compiler version: 2.96 20000920 (experimental)
Platform: alpha-redhat-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=alpha-redhat-linux --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-threads
Counting all warnings,
there are 137 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
35 ../../../gcc/gcc/java/verify.c
22 ../../../gcc/gcc/f/target.c
9 ../../gcc/gcc/reload.c
8 ../../gcc/gcc/sdbout.c
6 ../../gcc/gcc/loop.c
6 ../../../gcc/gcc/f/expr.c
6 ../../gcc/gcc/combine.c
5 ../../gcc/gcc/cse.c
4 /usr/include/bits/mathinline.h
4 ../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c
4 ../../../gcc/gcc/java/jcf-reader.c
3 ../../gcc/gcc/final.c
3 ../../gcc/gcc/cpplex.c
3 ../../gcc/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c
2 ../../gcc/gcc/gcc.c
2 ../../gcc/gcc/expr.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/regclass.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/print-rtl.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/java/jvspec.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/java/jv-scan.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/java/jcf-write.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/gcse.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/fold-const.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/cp/spew.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/cp/search.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/cppexp.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/cp/error.c
1 ../../../gcc/gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 ../../gcc/gcc/c-lex.c
Number of warning types:
64 value computed is not used
12 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
11 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
11 comparison between signed and unsigned
6 no previous prototype for \`???'
6 initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
6 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
4 function declaration isn't a prototype
4 \`???' defined but not used
3 traditional C rejects the 'u' suffix
3 string length \`???' is greater than the minimum length \`???' ISO C89 is required to support
1 unused parameter \`???'
1 traditional C rejects string concatenation
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 overflow in implicit constant conversion
1 \`long' switch expression not converted to \`int' in ISO C
1 implicit declaration of function \`???'
1 function macro strcmp must be used with arguments in traditional C