Re: Results for gcc-2.95 19990609 (prerelease) testsuite on i586-cygwin32

[Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU>]

On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

>   In message <c96e169d.2491f041@aol.com>you write:
>   > In a message dated 99-06-11 00:43:06 EDT, khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU writes:
>   > 
>   > << FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -O2  
>   >  FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
>   > -finline-functions  
>   >  FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -Os  
>   >  FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -O2  
>   >  FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer 
>   > -finline-functions  
>   >  FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/19990502-0.f,  -Os  
>   >   >>
>   > Are these time-out failures?  I see most of these when running the tests on
>   > an NT FAT16 file system, which is excruciatingly slow, but not with faster 
>   > combinations like W95/FAT32 or W2K/NTFS5.
> Highly unlikely.  We already know what this bug is, we just haven't fixed it
> yet.


Tim may be running into cygwin/expect problems, which there are many. I 
use a extremely hacked setup using Gordon Chaffee's Expect/NT and 
slightly modified dejagnu to do the testing, and then run random spot 
checks to make sure Expect/NT is doing the wrong thing. I did check 
these by hand and Jeff and Craig are correct that these should show up 
as failures.

Regards,
Mumit