This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Regressions on trunk at revision 186896 vs revision 186894


New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 34)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 34)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 41)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 41)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 44)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c  (test for warnings, line 44)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c near init (test for warnings, line 27)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011021-1.c near init (test for warnings, line 27)
FAIL: gcc.dg/m-un-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/m-un-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/m-un-2.c warning regression 2 (test for warnings, line 12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/m-un-2.c warning regression 2 (test for warnings, line 12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 14)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 14)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 7)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 7)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 8)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c  (test for warnings, line 8)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/missing-field-init-2.c (test for excess errors)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]