This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:53:55 +0100
Subject: Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!
References: <47C5EA1B.mailGNQ1131FG@suse.de> <20080228094309.GV32023@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802281046080.4133@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > memory tester didn't run for a while but I do believe this memory usage
> > growth is yours.  Looks like is_marked_p hack does not work somehow?
> 
> It should..., but as the patch seems to cause bootstrap failure on i686
> I am going to revert it again anyway.  I have no time investigating all
> this mess.

It would be shame to give it up completely.  Is the i686 breakage also
ggc_free related?  I can try to help here.
Reverting will definitly tell us if the memory usage goes back however.

Honza
> 
> Bah,
> 
> Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!
  - From: gcctest
- Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consumption!
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]