This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new FAILs on HEAD

From: Michael Ritzert <gcc at server2 dot mailsys dot de>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:59:01 +0200
Subject: Re: new FAILs on HEAD
References: <20051020182501.GA10193@server2.mailsys.de> <200510202322.48617.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:22:48PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > These new FAILs appeared since the last run:
> >
> > FAIL:	c64106c
[...]
> The new failure is spurious, I cannot reproduce it.

I can confirm that it disappeared in the next run. If it happens again, I'll put in on my
blacklist of spurious tests. The same goes for the new cd7103d failure.

BTW: the current blacklist is FAIL:\W*(cdd[[:digit:]]{4}|c52103x|cd7305a).
c52103x is constantly failing ATM. The rest didn't show up since at least the beginning
of october when I restarted the tester. I'll start removing these blacklists soon.

Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new FAILs on HEAD
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- new FAILs on HEAD
  - From: Michael Ritzert
- Re: new FAILs on HEAD
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]