This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 23 GCC HEAD regressions, 11 new, with your patch on 2005-09-10T03:22:32Z.
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, aph at redhat dot com, ddaney at avtrex dot com, pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr, dvorakz at suse dot cz, jconner at apple dot com, Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de, bkoz at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:25:44 -0700
- Subject: Re: 23 GCC HEAD regressions, 11 new, with your patch on 2005-09-10T03:22:32Z.
- References: <20050910211752.302C01A11FF4B@gcc-regress.apple.com> <b623ce685b1b402806c39cc860b0824c@physics.uc.edu> <m3d5nfqyc3.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 08:00:12PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
>
> | On Sep 10, 2005, at 5:17 PM, GCC regression checker wrote:
> |
> | > native g++.sum g++.dg/other/error8.C
> | > native g++.sum g++.dg/template/array3.C
> | > native g++.sum g++.dg/template/union1.C
> | > native g++.sum g++.old-deja/g++.other/anon2.C
> |
> | These was caused by one of the following patches:
>
> I regtested my patch on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It was clean.
> And I can't logically spot anything that would be mac-like box dependent.
FWIW, I see the failures on ppc-linux. Havn't investigated yet.
r~