This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: 10 GCC HEAD regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2005-08-17T16:49:11Z.
- From: "Lu, Hongjiu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>
- To: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: "Geoffrey Keating" <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, <gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:11:44 -0700
- Subject: RE: 10 GCC HEAD regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2005-08-17T16:49:11Z.
Oops. I was looking at the wrong log files. Keep checking.
H.J. Lu
Intel Corporation
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@physics.uc.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 7:20 AM
>To: Lu, Hongjiu
>Cc: Geoffrey Keating; gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org;
>pinskia@physics.uc.edu
>Subject: Re: 10 GCC HEAD regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2005-
>08-17T16:49:11Z.
>
>>
>> I think
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg00985.html
>>
>> is the cause. I am double checking it now. It may only affect 64bit
>> targets.
>
>I really doubt it is my patch as there are no "zero sized" structs in
>C++
>and I did test my patch and had no regressions.
>And this is just removing an assignment for "zero sized" structs and
>should
>not remove anything else as zero_sized_type checks the type to be
>correct
>(unless there is a front-end bug which sets a size to zero when it
>should not).
>
>Thanks,
>Andrew Pinski